jump to search

Harm reduction

The opportunity

It's simple; we want to reduce the public health impact of our products.

Harm reduction

Can a tobacco company really be serious about harm reduction?

We know tobacco products pose real and serious health risks and the only way to avoid these risks is not to use them. But many adults choose to smoke, so we are committed to researching, developing and commercialising less risky alternatives to regular cigarettes. And our ambition is to lead the Next Generation Products category worldwide.

What is harm reduction?

In the world of public health, harm reduction is about developing policies to try and minimise the negative health impact of a risky activity without stopping it entirely.

For example, advocating the use of condoms reduces the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. For tobacco, this means offering less risky alternatives to regular cigarettes for those smokers who cannot, or choose not to, give up.

 
 
An independent evidence review by Public Health England, concluded that 'the current expert estimate is that using e-cigarettes is around 95% safer than smoking'."
E-cigarettes: an evidence update, Public Health England, August 2015.
 

Advocating harm reduction as the way forward

The idea of tobacco harm reduction is not a new one and it has been a strategic priority for BAT for many years. We’ve long promoted snus, a type of low toxicant oral tobacco, which is a proven reduced risk product – but it lacks wide consumer appeal and availability globally. So it’s only relatively recently – with the rise in popularity of products such as Vapour Products (e-cigarettes)  – that harm reduction has moved from a concept to a global reality.

An increasing number in the scientific and public health community are now advocating harm reduction as the way forward for helping the one billion people worldwide who continue to smoke despite the known health risks.

In practice, this could mean that as well as traditional ‘stop smoking’ health services, smokers who’ve been unable to quit are encouraged to switch to less risky alternatives.

However, currently only a few governments actively support this approach. There are some public health experts and organisations with concerns that not enough is known yet about the health risks of Vapour Products (e-cigarettes)  and that they could undermine efforts to denormalise tobacco use. They are also suspicious of the tobacco industry’s involvement in tobacco harm reduction. For example, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has stated that the industry “can never be considered to be a legitimate public health partner or stakeholder.” [1]

Our approach

We believe there are credible less risky alternatives to regular cigarettes to address the public health impact of smoking.

We’ve spent decades researching how to create less risky products and we believe now the technology is right and we can now offer a satisfying quality, potentially less risky alternatives to traditional cigarettes for those adult smokers who want more choice.

For society, less risky alternatives have the potential to reduce smoking-related disease, while also being an area of commercial growth for our business.

We are investing in a pipeline of high-quality Next Generation Products to give consumers a choice of potentially less risky alternatives to smoking.

In 2013, we were the first international tobacco company to launch a Vapour Product (e-cigarette) – Vype – in the UK. Since then, we have used our experience and insights to develop the range with new devices, such as the Vype ePen, eTank and eBox. By the end of 2016, our Vype range was available across other markets including, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Colombia, Guatemala, Kuwait, Bahrain and the Philippines.

In December 2016 we opened our first Vype-branded store – in Milan, Italy – at the same time as launching a new type of Vapour Product, Vype Pebble.

In 2015, we launched our first Tobacco Heating Product, iFuse, in Romania. This electronic device heats a nicotine-containing liquid into an inhalable vapour, which then passes through a tobacco section, delivering tobacco flavour to the consumer.

In November 2016, we announced the launch of glo in Sendai, Japan. Similar to a cigarette, but with reduced risk potential, glo heats rather than burns tobacco, producing around 90% less toxicants* than a conventional cigarette. Following its launch in Sendai, glo is now available in Tokyo, Miyagi and Osaka in Japan. It has also been introduced in Canada (Vancouver) and in Switzerland, while in August 2017 BAT Korea announced the launch of glo, our second launch market in Asia after Japan.

We’re working with scientists and regulators to promote this next generation of products and advocate a regulatory approach that puts consumer safety and product quality first, while encouraging the growth of products that could help smokers cut down or quit.

Transparency and world-class science

We are committed to exemplary corporate conduct and transparency across the whole business – this includes our research and development.

Being transparent about our science is central to our approach. We publish details of our scientific research programmes on our dedicated website, www.bat-science.com , submit the results of studies to peer-reviewed journals and present widely at leading international conferences and events.


We have state-of-the-art R&D facilities and hundreds of scientists covering many different disciplines, and we work in collaboration with external researchers around the world, such as in the USA, Canada, Spain, Germany, China and Russia.

We even actively encourage regulators and other scientists to visit our research facilities in the UK. Watch our lab tour video.

The future

We understand that harm reduction is a contentious topic where opinion is often divided, and that some people are sceptical about our motivations.

We hope that our actions will demonstrate our continued commitment to harm reduction and that governments will carefully consider the potential benefits it can bring as part of a progressive approach to public health policy.

[1] Electronic nicotine delivery systems, a report by the WHO, July 2014.

* This is a comparison between the smoke from combusted tobacco in a standard 3R4F reference cigarette (approximately 9 mg tar), and the vapour from heated tobacco in glo, in terms of the 9 types of harmful components which the World Health Organisation recommends to reduce.
 
Tobacco Harm Reduction

Why tobacco harm reduction should be adopted as a progressive public health policy.

max
large
medium
small
mobile